Thursday, October 6, 2011
Wednesday, August 24, 2011
Thank You Steve !
I am penning a few words extemporaneously today. At about 6pm my nurse called to let me know that Steve Jobs had resigned as the CEO of Apple. In a way I was happy to hear about the resignation as opposed to something else. Then my thoughts ran into the realm of gratitude.
When I was a young man, I loved computers. I used to hang out at Radio Shack playing with TRS-80's and learned how to program in Basic. I never thought that I could own a computer. No one could afford a TRS-80. When an Apple store opened a block away from my house all of the geeks transitioned there, hanging out in our corduroys and Jordache/Sassoon jeans typing away and programming. It was only a matter of time before all of us mustered enough courage to work night and day to purchase an Apple II computer. I still have it! It was Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak who fueled the passion in us high school geeks. Although we also admired Bill Gates in the process, it was the Apple II that made us believe that we could do great things. Yes, it was only Visicalc and a crashy wordprocessor, but we created magic with the Assembler. Who can forget writing in numbers? Who remembers Peek and Poke?
My first computer job came with an Apple II+, writing a script program for an all-purpose store, showing clothing, matching colors etc. A collaborative project, it helped to pay down some of my school bills and tuition. I then began working in a really ritzy store in Manhattan, doing their accounts receivables and database programming (all primitive stuff now) for about 6 hours per week. The Apple community at that time was really close-knit. We shared code and helped each other as much as possible.
It all came to an end for me during college when everyone went to IBM PC's and I had to go with the flow or suffer! I went with the flow and literally, made no money for school, because the programming languages were so terrible. I couldn't "make magic" with a PC. So for years I held out, buying and building PC's until I finally came back to Apple in 2007. I have never looked back. It started with the purchase of an iPod for my wife two years earlier. And then the full conversion. I got back into programming again, albeit, I find OSX a lot harder than Basic or Assembler. But there is really one person to thank for that.
I found the convergence of Apple products to be more appealing than Windows. Everything just started working well together. The computers spoke to each other. Devices recognized each other immediately. Even now, when I was "forced" to use a Windows 7 machine, it could not find my printer. When I plugged in my Mac, it found the printer, the wifi - configured itself for its use, and just worked right out of the box. Yes, Windows does some of that well now, but Windows XP and Windows Vista did not. I finally found myself using my own cloud storage system. At home and away, everything just worked. I would only have to put my NAS address in once and it would find the NAS drive every time. I didn't need to sync machines etc or sign in repetitively. I have still not had a virus in 5 years on my Mac. Although I cowered and installed an antivirus system a year ago only because I couldn't convince someone in my family to stop running in Root. I did not want to press my luck.
And then I started watching the keynotes. Actually, I started watching them in 2005 and was impressed and excited by the presentations that Steve Jobs gave. They were exciting, invigorating and entertaining. I wanted a Mac. The commercials were priceless because they were so true. I eventually purchased an Intel iMac and soon got back into writing again, because I could concentrate on writing and not the process of file management. I again ran into the Apple community helping each other with problems. Open source software that was to die for. Software that actually fit a niche nicely. And of course, the CRAZIES! Ah yes, where would we be without mentioning the Crazies! The ones who make Crazy movies about the Mac and about their allegiance to Apple. The ones who stalked out the Comp-USA stores answering questions for customers that the store clerks had no idea about. The ones who now stalk Best Buy stores doing the same thing. The ones who look out for every Steve Jobs poll on Engadget and ensure that everyone votes at least twice - at home and at work. The ones who push the envelope on Macrumors, MacDailyNews, Engadget,TUAW, Appleinsider and MacWorld, asking for the impossible. The thing about the Crazies is that one guy at the helm has been listening, reading and affecting the change that they have requested (some of the times). That person has been Steve Jobs. Steve has been represented in the media as being brilliant, assertive, rude, nice, bold and certainly ground breaking. He has had a vision of personal computing that has been equaled only in Science Fiction. He has made possible that which we believed was impossible. The iPod brought paying customers to the post Napster world. He convinced record companies to pay attention to this nascient entity and they did. He brought dramatic changes to the PC by building All-In-Ones and then sped up the process by actually saying goodbye to a long time chip ally - Motorola. The Intel chip propelled the iMac to greatness and catapaulted the Macbook Pro to being the number one most requested laptop in the world. He had the vision to see what people wanted. He implemented the ideas of the Crazies slowly instead of all at once. He made it fun for anyone to play music, write books/screenplays, make movies by relying on that thing that humans do best - concentrating on creating the project. Gone was the process which made programs such as Windows Cakewalk (for music) and various video programs seem archaic. iLife made it all so simple. And above all else, it was all included in the Mac. From the day that you purchased it, you were working on your projects.
He helped to revolutionize the way in which we watch television. Purchasing episodes and seasons digitally, although the encryption was quite silly, it was a start and a position of leadership that others would run to follow. Even in music, iTunes still leads the way.
But if the revolution was in the PC, created and reaffirmed by Apple, it was the telephone that once and for all made Apple the King that it should have been 20 years ago. I have never forgotten the day, the hour, the minute that I saw the presentation for the iPhone. Steve Jobs reiteration of the three devices being simultaneously made by Apple and the revelation that all three devices were really ONE DEVICE. I remain, to this day, stunned by that presentation. It was by far the best presentation I have ever seen even 4 years later. The build up, which was literally pent up demand for a major change in the way in which we use a telephone had been going on for months. No one knew what the final product would look like. And I assure you that no one knew that it would have ONE BUTTON. It was the perfect device. Finally someone had listened. To make matters worse, the ridiculous statement by Palm about computer companies not being able to take over the phone business, made the iPhone even more coveted. Steve Jobs got it right! He understood what customers wanted in a phone. So much so that Google, Samsung and even Palm itself literally made buttonless phones and called them original. Everyone who wasn't living under a rock knew what was going on. Worse, the purchase of non-Apple look alikes were based more on cut rate pricing and giveaways rather than wants. AT&T continues to sell the iPhone 3GS above other smartphones. Verizon has finally admitted that many people bought Droids because they could not get iPhones and the sales of iPhones has proven that.
Steve Jobs is a visionary. His ability to see what customers want and to drive his engineers to the point of near impossibility and excellence has been amazing. Questions are now being asked as to whether Tim Cook, appointed CEO today will have that same vision as Steve has had for the past twenty years. Apple over the years has created some phenomenal hardware which has been closely linked with its software. That union has led it to being one of the greatest tech stories of all time. As a kid, I looked at my computer as a device that would change the world. It changed the world for me, allowing me to pay a lot of my tuition; completing projects and succeeding in this world that has become the future. Three guys were followed closely by my classmates. We watched everything that they did. It didn't matter if we were going into Medicine, Finance or Law, we followed these three guys like hawks. Bill Gates and Steve Wozniak were one of the Crazies, but only one did we look to for what was next. We watched him get thrown under the bus by the company that he founded. We watched him while he was at Nexus and wondered when he would return. And when he did, we jumped for joy. We became the Crazies. We talked about it at Christmas reunions. Some of us took longer than others to return to the Apple fold, whether we were detoured by work or school, we eventually came back. It wasn't out of some crazy loyalty that we returned. We returned because we realized that we were missing something. We missed not having to deal with The Process. We longed for the need to return back to the simplicity of doing that which we set out to do. Neither the hardware nor the software should distract us from our primary goal. We returned because of STEVE JOBS.
For making us the kids of yesteryear love science.
For making us, the kids of yesteryear, hang out in Apple Stores programming and have fun.
For making us make possible that which was once considered impossible.
For making me and my kids do our work without relying on the process.
For making my kids love programming (MIT's Scratch)
For making my wife love using a computer once again.
For making me pay for some of my tuition due to making affordable hardware (Apple II+).
For making music fun again.
For making family movie making fun again.
For making it easy to make a DVD (no mean feat in the early days) from personal film.
For making homework fun to do.
For making it easy to write custom software for kids.
For making the software less prone to viruses and other nasties.
For showing us that there is a different way to do things.
For making us quietly convince our IT departments to THINK DIFFERENT!
FOR CHANGING THE WORLD ! AND FOR MAKING US ALL THINK DIFFERENT!
S T E V E J O B S,
T H A N K Y O U.
When I was a young man, I loved computers. I used to hang out at Radio Shack playing with TRS-80's and learned how to program in Basic. I never thought that I could own a computer. No one could afford a TRS-80. When an Apple store opened a block away from my house all of the geeks transitioned there, hanging out in our corduroys and Jordache/Sassoon jeans typing away and programming. It was only a matter of time before all of us mustered enough courage to work night and day to purchase an Apple II computer. I still have it! It was Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak who fueled the passion in us high school geeks. Although we also admired Bill Gates in the process, it was the Apple II that made us believe that we could do great things. Yes, it was only Visicalc and a crashy wordprocessor, but we created magic with the Assembler. Who can forget writing in numbers? Who remembers Peek and Poke?
My first computer job came with an Apple II+, writing a script program for an all-purpose store, showing clothing, matching colors etc. A collaborative project, it helped to pay down some of my school bills and tuition. I then began working in a really ritzy store in Manhattan, doing their accounts receivables and database programming (all primitive stuff now) for about 6 hours per week. The Apple community at that time was really close-knit. We shared code and helped each other as much as possible.
It all came to an end for me during college when everyone went to IBM PC's and I had to go with the flow or suffer! I went with the flow and literally, made no money for school, because the programming languages were so terrible. I couldn't "make magic" with a PC. So for years I held out, buying and building PC's until I finally came back to Apple in 2007. I have never looked back. It started with the purchase of an iPod for my wife two years earlier. And then the full conversion. I got back into programming again, albeit, I find OSX a lot harder than Basic or Assembler. But there is really one person to thank for that.
I found the convergence of Apple products to be more appealing than Windows. Everything just started working well together. The computers spoke to each other. Devices recognized each other immediately. Even now, when I was "forced" to use a Windows 7 machine, it could not find my printer. When I plugged in my Mac, it found the printer, the wifi - configured itself for its use, and just worked right out of the box. Yes, Windows does some of that well now, but Windows XP and Windows Vista did not. I finally found myself using my own cloud storage system. At home and away, everything just worked. I would only have to put my NAS address in once and it would find the NAS drive every time. I didn't need to sync machines etc or sign in repetitively. I have still not had a virus in 5 years on my Mac. Although I cowered and installed an antivirus system a year ago only because I couldn't convince someone in my family to stop running in Root. I did not want to press my luck.
And then I started watching the keynotes. Actually, I started watching them in 2005 and was impressed and excited by the presentations that Steve Jobs gave. They were exciting, invigorating and entertaining. I wanted a Mac. The commercials were priceless because they were so true. I eventually purchased an Intel iMac and soon got back into writing again, because I could concentrate on writing and not the process of file management. I again ran into the Apple community helping each other with problems. Open source software that was to die for. Software that actually fit a niche nicely. And of course, the CRAZIES! Ah yes, where would we be without mentioning the Crazies! The ones who make Crazy movies about the Mac and about their allegiance to Apple. The ones who stalked out the Comp-USA stores answering questions for customers that the store clerks had no idea about. The ones who now stalk Best Buy stores doing the same thing. The ones who look out for every Steve Jobs poll on Engadget and ensure that everyone votes at least twice - at home and at work. The ones who push the envelope on Macrumors, MacDailyNews, Engadget,TUAW, Appleinsider and MacWorld, asking for the impossible. The thing about the Crazies is that one guy at the helm has been listening, reading and affecting the change that they have requested (some of the times). That person has been Steve Jobs. Steve has been represented in the media as being brilliant, assertive, rude, nice, bold and certainly ground breaking. He has had a vision of personal computing that has been equaled only in Science Fiction. He has made possible that which we believed was impossible. The iPod brought paying customers to the post Napster world. He convinced record companies to pay attention to this nascient entity and they did. He brought dramatic changes to the PC by building All-In-Ones and then sped up the process by actually saying goodbye to a long time chip ally - Motorola. The Intel chip propelled the iMac to greatness and catapaulted the Macbook Pro to being the number one most requested laptop in the world. He had the vision to see what people wanted. He implemented the ideas of the Crazies slowly instead of all at once. He made it fun for anyone to play music, write books/screenplays, make movies by relying on that thing that humans do best - concentrating on creating the project. Gone was the process which made programs such as Windows Cakewalk (for music) and various video programs seem archaic. iLife made it all so simple. And above all else, it was all included in the Mac. From the day that you purchased it, you were working on your projects.
He helped to revolutionize the way in which we watch television. Purchasing episodes and seasons digitally, although the encryption was quite silly, it was a start and a position of leadership that others would run to follow. Even in music, iTunes still leads the way.
But if the revolution was in the PC, created and reaffirmed by Apple, it was the telephone that once and for all made Apple the King that it should have been 20 years ago. I have never forgotten the day, the hour, the minute that I saw the presentation for the iPhone. Steve Jobs reiteration of the three devices being simultaneously made by Apple and the revelation that all three devices were really ONE DEVICE. I remain, to this day, stunned by that presentation. It was by far the best presentation I have ever seen even 4 years later. The build up, which was literally pent up demand for a major change in the way in which we use a telephone had been going on for months. No one knew what the final product would look like. And I assure you that no one knew that it would have ONE BUTTON. It was the perfect device. Finally someone had listened. To make matters worse, the ridiculous statement by Palm about computer companies not being able to take over the phone business, made the iPhone even more coveted. Steve Jobs got it right! He understood what customers wanted in a phone. So much so that Google, Samsung and even Palm itself literally made buttonless phones and called them original. Everyone who wasn't living under a rock knew what was going on. Worse, the purchase of non-Apple look alikes were based more on cut rate pricing and giveaways rather than wants. AT&T continues to sell the iPhone 3GS above other smartphones. Verizon has finally admitted that many people bought Droids because they could not get iPhones and the sales of iPhones has proven that.
Steve Jobs is a visionary. His ability to see what customers want and to drive his engineers to the point of near impossibility and excellence has been amazing. Questions are now being asked as to whether Tim Cook, appointed CEO today will have that same vision as Steve has had for the past twenty years. Apple over the years has created some phenomenal hardware which has been closely linked with its software. That union has led it to being one of the greatest tech stories of all time. As a kid, I looked at my computer as a device that would change the world. It changed the world for me, allowing me to pay a lot of my tuition; completing projects and succeeding in this world that has become the future. Three guys were followed closely by my classmates. We watched everything that they did. It didn't matter if we were going into Medicine, Finance or Law, we followed these three guys like hawks. Bill Gates and Steve Wozniak were one of the Crazies, but only one did we look to for what was next. We watched him get thrown under the bus by the company that he founded. We watched him while he was at Nexus and wondered when he would return. And when he did, we jumped for joy. We became the Crazies. We talked about it at Christmas reunions. Some of us took longer than others to return to the Apple fold, whether we were detoured by work or school, we eventually came back. It wasn't out of some crazy loyalty that we returned. We returned because we realized that we were missing something. We missed not having to deal with The Process. We longed for the need to return back to the simplicity of doing that which we set out to do. Neither the hardware nor the software should distract us from our primary goal. We returned because of STEVE JOBS.
For making us the kids of yesteryear love science.
For making us, the kids of yesteryear, hang out in Apple Stores programming and have fun.
For making us make possible that which was once considered impossible.
For making me and my kids do our work without relying on the process.
For making my kids love programming (MIT's Scratch)
For making my wife love using a computer once again.
For making me pay for some of my tuition due to making affordable hardware (Apple II+).
For making music fun again.
For making family movie making fun again.
For making it easy to make a DVD (no mean feat in the early days) from personal film.
For making homework fun to do.
For making it easy to write custom software for kids.
For making the software less prone to viruses and other nasties.
For showing us that there is a different way to do things.
For making us quietly convince our IT departments to THINK DIFFERENT!
FOR CHANGING THE WORLD ! AND FOR MAKING US ALL THINK DIFFERENT!
S T E V E J O B S,
T H A N K Y O U.
Labels:
apple iphone,
CEO,
Editorial,
Steve Jobs
Wednesday, July 27, 2011
FDA proposes Health App Guidelines...
It was bound to happen. The FDA has decided to get involved in the Medical App process giving guidelines for apps running on iOS, Android and WebOS. Full details are listed here:
FDA Guidelines for Apps
This is a comprehensive guideline for those wishing to write apps pertaining to medical management.
For an updated list of NIH approved apps, go to the following website:
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mobile/
FDA Guidelines for Apps
This is a comprehensive guideline for those wishing to write apps pertaining to medical management.
For an updated list of NIH approved apps, go to the following website:
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mobile/
Labels:
apple iphone,
FDA,
iOS 4.2,
iPad,
MEDICINE,
MOBILEMEDICINE,
NIH
Monday, July 4, 2011
Some likes and concerns for iOS 5 at WWDC 2011.
1. iMessenger. -- Let me just say that I almost fell out of my chair when I saw Steve Jobs talk about this. To me, this appeared to be $240 per year saved from this point onward or $20 per month for two 1000 texts/month plans. Since most of the texting was between the wife and myself and friends who already have iPhones, I think that I would probably save in reality $120 per year, dropping the 1000 text plan to 200 for those laggards who refuse to pick up an iPhone. This would drop the bill to $10 per month for 2 iPhones.
But hold on! There are some issues here that will need to be ironed out before I drop anything. For starters, in my professional life I rely on text messages that have to be answered in a timely manner. From what I have seen of the cloud services, for example with TODO, there have been some delays of up to 5 minutes getting the cloud to send an alarm down to my phone. If this was an urgent text message from the family or work, those 5 minutes would seem crucial. Is Apple willing to take the risk for something such as this? But more importantly, will there be a bypass button to send a message via SMS instead of via Apple? Secondly what of the stored messages? Who keeps those? Are they deleted permanently?
Personally, I rarely use texting as a 911 solution so the above may be hyperbole in the real world. But it would be nice to know if this solution could really shave my monthly phone bill considerably.
2. iTunes Music Match. -- Well, this is not medical, but my goodness was this a whopper of an announcement. I recall watching the keynote and having someone ask: " So you can only do the songs that you buy on iTunes? Epic fail dude...." Only to hear Mr. Jobs say those magical 3 words, "One More Thing!" The announcement of being able to convert your entire library into 256 khz pieces was enticing. And with a 25,000 song limit, this seems like a lifetime of music for conversion to the digital cloud.
And then I got to thinking. Was this the music industry's way of capitalizing on all of the "uncaptured" revenue from sources such as Napster, Limewire etc? A sort of Amnesty for downloaders? Or an admission of "We don't care where you get your music from, as long as you use this locker to store it for $25 per year."
And then I heard about the way in which iTunes and iCloud would assess whether you had a song or not - by reading Metadata in the song. This is obviously laden with future abuse! Metadata could scream " Lady Gaga " while actually representing " Madonna " only to have iCloud download Lady Gaga. Increasing the clever meta data hound with more "free" music. It could be that all of this washes out with the $25 per year subscription plan.
The good? You finally have all of your music in one place, without the need to use that wretched USB dongle to the PC. It's a great idea.
3. The Camera Software -- Wonderful and about time! However, kudos could have been given to the real mavericks who championed using hardware buttons in the first place. Somehow I thought that the hardware button issue was to prevent newer additions of hardware becoming incompatible with the software in question. But what do I know?
4. Still lacking or at least not mentioned. CUSTOMIZED RING TONES FOR SMS. Read my other posts for my opinions on this. Steve ! I cannot get rid of my pager if I cannot have this feature.
5. Read Later. Somewhere in the world a man by the name of MARCO ARMENT is fuming vociferously as his creation becomes a part of an operating system, reducing his potential revenue significantly. I would have much preferred Apple to have purchased Marco's company. His idea was really original and super for cross platform use. I can use Marco's product on my Kindle, Mac, PC or iPhone. I was surprised to find it here.
While on the subject of "gentle annihilation," there appeared to be features taken from other apps throughout the session. If you're a developer, you have to be scratching your head on some of this. I know I was.
6. Still lacking. The codec issue. Will Apple ever support Divx or other non Quicktime codecs?
7. iPhone Notifications. --- Wow, about time on this one. The present notification system was great for 2007, but not now. This one looks like a winner. Non obtrusive and I like the idea of not having to open my phone to get things to view my messages.
8. Missing --- iPad Guest Login. Handing off my iPad to someone to demo is a no go when I have my email available for all to peruse.
9. Wireless Synch. Thank You. Enough Said.
10. Calendar formation without the PC. -- Hopefully this means that I can make contacts separable by whatever criteria I choose - ie. Work/Home/Family etc. This is sorely lacking in iOS 1-4. All of the folders and separation are done on the PC in another application outside of iTunes. The integration issue is going to entice me to leave Google's email and calendar servers. I have always wanted to sync my calendar with my wife's so that we can figure out vacations etc. Without a Mobile Me account, this wasn't easily attainable. In addition, we didn't really want to have every single detail of our lives given to Google. Don't get me wrong, I like Google, but having commercials interrupt my email and directing ads to me during the reading of emails is just not my cup of tea (We had a death in the family a few years ago and while making funeral arrangements found ads for caskets - that was a bit too much for both of us). Apple's new calendar set up is really nice.
11. Reminders. -- Interesting. My wife has not been a fan of TODO due to its complexity. The idea of this program going across all iOS devices is appealing. For me, I still love TODO, so I will have to see how this one pans out.
12. THE CLOUD. Well what can you say about this? It's nice and the implementation looks really good at this point. Will they open the cloud to other documents though? Will Microsoft files be allowed in the cloud? How about documents that do not currently run on iWork? Will the cloud be accessible by third party vendors?
Where I see this coming into play was represented by several things that happened a few weeks ago. My wife and I were working on a document together. When it came time to store the document, we had an issue. We had to put the document on a Mac for further editing. Emailing the document worked, but that really was not an optional thing to do. Now, we will be able to have the document pushed to each device and we can work on it together. I really like that.
One worry about the cloud is the idea of automatically downloading apps to unsuspecting people. For example, will my kids automatically get songs that I download to my iPhone because they are on the same account as me? Is there a way to separate ownership of devices other than the use of the Apple ID? Without the software in front of me, I cannot tell.
Overall, I have to say that iOS 5 is going to be a great update to iOS . On the PC side, OS X Lion is a bit iffy. I am still in love with the independent software providers and I am seeing a push to centralize everything. That may not be the best thing in the world. One thought that I had with Lion is what do you do if your computer crashes? Initially, one would put in the DVD which acted as a Rescue Disk. What do you do now? More on that later..... For now, I am looking forward to OS 5.
LDD.
Labels:
apple iphone,
iOS 5,
software
Monday, May 30, 2011
Conde Nast....Well Done !
Condé Nast began offering in-app subscriptions for iPad versions of Allure, Glamour, Golf Digest and Vanity Fair on this month. The publisher began offering The New Yorker iPad subscriptions just a week earlier, marking the first time it has used Apple’s new in-app subscription system. (1)
It took a few months, but the publishers finally woke up and noticed that there was coffee brewing in the kitchen. When I purchased my iPad a few weeks ago I was absolutely shocked to find the staggering prices of the electronic versions of magazines. $4.99 per copy? No ink! No sweet smelling perfume cards dropping out of the center page, no useless coupons for cut rate pricing on yearly subscriptions? No, this was just the electronic copy of the magazine. Naturally, I wanted to see what all the fuss was about so I purchased one. And yes, it was very good. Excellent navigation and excellent content. But $4.99 per copy?
The reviewers on iTunes lambasted Conde Nast and others for essentially gouging the consumer. I totally agreed with their sentiments. The age of electronic media was supposed to decrease the price of distribution for the creator and this was supposed to be reflected in the final pricing to the consumer. Until last week, this began to look like the Wild West, with publishers attempting to find the pain point for consumers.
But the magazine publishers may have arisen due to what has happened in the e-Book arena. The eBook publishers still haven't figured out that $9.99 is the point of no return (although Amazon did very early on); anything above that leaves a reader with an option to purchase the hardcover version of the book. Surprisingly, although being first to the table, e-Book publishers are still learning or should I say testing the waters to find that pain point. Unfortunately they may have waited a little too long, because the e-Book authors, buoyed by Amazon predominantly and a number of new all electronic publishing houses (Zumaya Publications for example), have found ways to undercut the $9.99 model and sell their products for $0.99 to $2.99. Some authours have even taken to self-publishing their works, bringing down the price to gross up to 60-70% profit. While this may seem like small change, if an author can show volume across the channels with low pricing, some authors can essentially quit their day jobs. Ask Amanda Hocking, a self published author, who sold over 1 million copies of 9 e-Books, grossing over $2 million in sales in just over 1 year. This self-publishing phenom penned a hard-cover 4-book deal with St. Martin's Press for a young-adult paranormal series to be called "Watersong." For this she will receive $2 million. Her Amazon e-Books are selling for $0.99 - $2.99. Weblink here.
With negative reviews, and probably seeing the carnage that has become the e-Book market, Conde Nast has finally stepped up to the plate and possibly saved the day for magazine publishers throughout the world. They have finally lowered the pricing on individual publications, but more importantly, they have created subscription pricing. And the prices are more reasonable than they previously were. They started with The New Yorker, which was incredibly and ridiculously overpriced at $4.99 per issue (an obvious fishing expedition), ending the hate by offering a print/web/ipad bundle for $69.99/yr; while an iPad and web edition is now $59.99/yr. There is also a monthly option of $6.99 for the former and $5.99 for the latter. The New Yorker is a weekly publication so this comes out to about $1.50 per issue. Not Bad!
Adding to this, Conde Nast came out with additional iPad subscription plans for Allure, Glamour, Golf Digest and Vanity Fair. All of these publications are using the In-App system by Apple. I want to tip my hat to Conde Nast for essentially coming to the table and thinking reasonably about their pricing. Some may think that the prices are still too high; you may be right, but I do believe that magazines need to stay in business and it is important for them to come to the table in the New Age of media with a plan that shows a decrease in the price that consumers have to pay. It is the only way that adoption can take place. It is only a matter of time before all of the other magazine conglomerates, who were salivating at the $4.99 looney-tunes price point come around to subscription pricing as well.
But for now, I tip my hat to Conde Nast. Next stop, addressing the looney tunes pricing of medical and educational e-Textbooks.
LDD.
(1) http://gigaom.com/apple/apple-wins-as-conde-nast-signs-on-with-ipad-subscriptions/
It took a few months, but the publishers finally woke up and noticed that there was coffee brewing in the kitchen. When I purchased my iPad a few weeks ago I was absolutely shocked to find the staggering prices of the electronic versions of magazines. $4.99 per copy? No ink! No sweet smelling perfume cards dropping out of the center page, no useless coupons for cut rate pricing on yearly subscriptions? No, this was just the electronic copy of the magazine. Naturally, I wanted to see what all the fuss was about so I purchased one. And yes, it was very good. Excellent navigation and excellent content. But $4.99 per copy?
The reviewers on iTunes lambasted Conde Nast and others for essentially gouging the consumer. I totally agreed with their sentiments. The age of electronic media was supposed to decrease the price of distribution for the creator and this was supposed to be reflected in the final pricing to the consumer. Until last week, this began to look like the Wild West, with publishers attempting to find the pain point for consumers.
But the magazine publishers may have arisen due to what has happened in the e-Book arena. The eBook publishers still haven't figured out that $9.99 is the point of no return (although Amazon did very early on); anything above that leaves a reader with an option to purchase the hardcover version of the book. Surprisingly, although being first to the table, e-Book publishers are still learning or should I say testing the waters to find that pain point. Unfortunately they may have waited a little too long, because the e-Book authors, buoyed by Amazon predominantly and a number of new all electronic publishing houses (Zumaya Publications for example), have found ways to undercut the $9.99 model and sell their products for $0.99 to $2.99. Some authours have even taken to self-publishing their works, bringing down the price to gross up to 60-70% profit. While this may seem like small change, if an author can show volume across the channels with low pricing, some authors can essentially quit their day jobs. Ask Amanda Hocking, a self published author, who sold over 1 million copies of 9 e-Books, grossing over $2 million in sales in just over 1 year. This self-publishing phenom penned a hard-cover 4-book deal with St. Martin's Press for a young-adult paranormal series to be called "Watersong." For this she will receive $2 million. Her Amazon e-Books are selling for $0.99 - $2.99. Weblink here.
With negative reviews, and probably seeing the carnage that has become the e-Book market, Conde Nast has finally stepped up to the plate and possibly saved the day for magazine publishers throughout the world. They have finally lowered the pricing on individual publications, but more importantly, they have created subscription pricing. And the prices are more reasonable than they previously were. They started with The New Yorker, which was incredibly and ridiculously overpriced at $4.99 per issue (an obvious fishing expedition), ending the hate by offering a print/web/ipad bundle for $69.99/yr; while an iPad and web edition is now $59.99/yr. There is also a monthly option of $6.99 for the former and $5.99 for the latter. The New Yorker is a weekly publication so this comes out to about $1.50 per issue. Not Bad!
Adding to this, Conde Nast came out with additional iPad subscription plans for Allure, Glamour, Golf Digest and Vanity Fair. All of these publications are using the In-App system by Apple. I want to tip my hat to Conde Nast for essentially coming to the table and thinking reasonably about their pricing. Some may think that the prices are still too high; you may be right, but I do believe that magazines need to stay in business and it is important for them to come to the table in the New Age of media with a plan that shows a decrease in the price that consumers have to pay. It is the only way that adoption can take place. It is only a matter of time before all of the other magazine conglomerates, who were salivating at the $4.99 looney-tunes price point come around to subscription pricing as well.
But for now, I tip my hat to Conde Nast. Next stop, addressing the looney tunes pricing of medical and educational e-Textbooks.
LDD.
(1) http://gigaom.com/apple/apple-wins-as-conde-nast-signs-on-with-ipad-subscriptions/
Labels:
iPad condenast magazine
Sunday, April 24, 2011
Temporary Solution to AFP, SMB & NAS problems after OSX 10.6.7 update
Okay, so I'm not a command line expert. When I owned my first Apple IIe years ago, I left the world of command line entries behind. One of the beautiful things about OS X ( and Windows for that matter) is the lack of a need to know about command line entries. However, the thing that separates new computer owners from the ones of my youth is the fact that those who grew up in the early days know exactly what is going on under those pretty little icons.I have been spoiled by the Mac, after walking away from Windows 5 years ago. But I remember in those early days of Mac Loving, I still had an interest in what was going on in the background. I wanted to know why the disk drive kept running in the background (Usually Spotlight updating) or more mundane issues, so I began learning a little about OSX. As always I have books on the subject, but stopped buying any more books due to the fact that Apple updates its OS every 2 years, making physical books obsolete.
Coming from Windows I had to know aboutfile servers and a new nomenclature for file transfers, especially the ones that were strictly adherent to the Macintosh: AFP (Apple Filing Protocol) instead of SMB (Server Message Block). I needed to know these two separate protocols if I wanted to access a Windows Network Drive or the Windows XP machine that I used. Additionally, file access to the Mac required the above knowledge in order to access and transfer files to and from the Mac. With the advances of NAS drives, creating a wonderful extension to the hard drive on the computer, I had to keep up with being able to place and retrieve data from both machines regardless of which machine I was using. To begin with, I hated SMB protocols because my disk would always disappear, especially when the machine was turned off. With the machine off, DHCP would take over when I turned the machine on again and my wonderful SMB drive would have a new ip address and so nothing would work. Live backups were a nightmare. As I learned more, I realize now that I could have leased the DHCP address for a long time and that would have resolved the issue.
Although learning to use AFP on the Mac was new, it was much easier. It kept track of the NAS drives even when I turned off the machine and rebooted it. To be honest, using AFP was akin to having a disk drive sitting right next to me. However, once in a while it wouldn't work. Some of the Windows oriented NAS drives would not always respond to the SMB or AFP command. This would happen in Windows and on the Mac. However on the Mac I found a solution in one of the books.
With OSX 10.4 there was an interesting command in the command line that showed whether OSX would read/write to the NAS drive. If written with a boolean command, you could set up a signal to show whether the drive is ready to read/write. I recall in those early years, 2007 to be precise, how I would toil away trying to decipher why a drive wouldn't work. It was these wonderful commands that set me free finally.
I never thought that I would have to return to those days again because my newer network drives are so much more resilient. First, not having Windows to deal with, I was able to use long file names and strange characters, something that we can now do in Windows 7. Until I upgraded to OSX 10.6.7 I was in network Nirvana.
So, after upgrading my OSX Snow leopard 10.6.6 TO OSX 10.6.7 as a good Apple Netizen should do a few days ago, I was stunned to find that I could no longer write to my NAS drive. I thought it was my virus protection acting up, so I turned it off and actually deleted it (I have since reinstalled it, since that was not the problem). All transfers to and from the NAS drive would hang. I then remembered the last time that this occurred. It was during those early learning days. I wrote it down on a note card.
It turns out that there is a command in OSX that when written with a Boolean request can tell you if the drive is accessible or not. I believe that the latest update may have turned off a switch that enables Cleartext. Cleartext is a ZeroConfig set up, meaning that you do very little to set up your network (a la AppleTV) since Apple takes care of all of this behind the scenes. It is what enables your printer to "just work." You can use names like "My_Printer" to signify that your printer is attached to a certain ip address hiding behind your router (preferably an Apple Airport Extreme) and it will show up as "My_Printer.local" something much easier to remember than 10.12.70.1 or something akin to that.
In reading the latest update, there is a mention of Apple correcting AFP mount errors and SMB mount problems. Here is the full text from Apple:
Summary
In Mac OS X v10.5 and 10.6 you can use a URL in the form afp://myserver.mydomain.com/Sharepoint/Folder or the mount_afp command in Terminal to mount a shared volume on an AFP server.Products Affected
Mac OS X Server 10.6, Mac OS X v10.6In Mail.app or Safari, when you click on a URL in the form afp://myserver.mydomain.com/Sharepoint/Folder , the Finder will mount the volume named Sharepoint on the AFP server myserver.mydomain.com, and open a window showing the contents of the directory named Folder. If you drag the text of the URL to your Desktop, it will create an AFP link which you can double-click to open that folder.
The mount_afp command can be used in a Terminal window or a shell script to mount a shared folder on an AFP server. For more information, typeman mount_afp in a Terminal window.
Note : The path at which the shared folder is mounted is different in Mac OS X v10.6 through 10.6.6 compared to other versions of Mac OS X. For details, see the Additional Information section below.
Additional Information
In Mac OS X v10.6 through 10.6.6, a URL that points to a file on the server (for example afp://myserver.mydomain.com/Sharepoint/Folder/File.txt) will not work. This issue is resolved in Mac OS X v10.6.7 and later.Example: afp://myserver.mydomain.com/Sharepoint/Folder
In Mac OS X v10.6 through 10.6.6, if the target of the URL or mount_afp command is a folder within the sharepoint, the folder will be mounted. In Mac OS X v10.0 through 10.5, and Mac OS X 10.6.7 or later, the sharepoint is mounted.
When you click on this link in Mac OS X 10.0-10.5 and 10.6.7 and later, the Finder will mount the volume Sharepoint. The local path to the shared folder will be /Volumes/Sharepoint/Folder/.
When you click on this link in Mac OS X 10.6-10.6.6 the Finder will mount the subdirectory Folder. The local path to the shared folder will be /Volumes/Folder/.
Example: mount_afp afp://myserver.mydomain.com/Sharepoint/Folder /Volumes/mntpnt
In Mac OS X v10.5 and 10.6.7 or later, this command will mount the volume Sharepoint at /Volumes/mntpnt. The local path to the shared folder will be /Volumes/mntpnt/Folder/.
In Mac OS X v10.6 through 10.6.6, this command will mount the subdirectory Folder at /Volumes/mntpnt. The local path to the shared folder will be /Volumes/mntpnt/.
I think that somewhere along the road, they turned off the Cleartext switch. Cleartext is used because the NAS drives are running behind a Router, hence there isn't really a need to encrypt passwords, although it is interesting to note that in Snow Leopard, Apple does not give you a choice of not using a password as they do with the AFP protocol when using SMB. Regardless of whether a password is used or not, I was able to find out that neither an SMB nor AFP protocol would work on my NAS drive. The Boolean query showed a " 0 " for the ability to write to the drive. In discussing this with a Mac Guru and in going back to my meticulous notes that I took 5 years ago, the query is for Cleartext and it is found to be turned off by default. But only after upgrading to 10.6.7. On my other Leopard machine which does not have the update and that was never upgraded to Snow Leopard, no matter what I do, the boolean query remains at "1" meaning that it is writeable and accepts Cleartext.
What happens is this. You log on to your computer (I am assuming that you are using AFP and using a MAC). You click on to your Network Attached Drive somewhere in your house, apartment or office. There is a delay. The drive may or may not open at all. If and when it does, everything looks okay. You try to open a folder and the infamous equivalent to the BSOD (Blue Screen of Death on Windows) ensues - The spinning Beach Ball. Sometimes you can even get past the folder stage and the system will hang when you try to upload to the directory or download from it. Or, heaven forbid, Time Machine decides to use it. What you are left doing is trying to Force Kill the Finder. That is something that is not nice, because it means that all of your icons disappear temporarily until the next boot up and you're left "hanging." This is the so-called Kernel Panic.
With the knowledge that the Cleartext flag is turned off, I found that I could get some work done by turning it back on. The technique used is listed below. I should let you know that this worked for a while, but it seemed that I had to continue turning this on again, every time I turned on the machine.
Thus, if the solution listed does not work, try the solution after this. I tried two other solutions before finally finding one that eventually works for now.
Here is the old school tactic first:
1. Check to see if cleartext is already enabled:
A. Shut down the computer.
B. Shut down the server, modem, gateway modem etc. (basically shut everything off). Then turn everything back on.
C. Turn on your computer. Go to the login where you plan to use the NAS drive.
D. Hit the Spotlight icon (looking glass) and type in TERMINAL. Click on the TERMINAL icon.
E. While in the terminal, type the following verbatim:
defaults read com.apple.appleshareclient afp_cleartext_allow
This should return a "1." If it does then the problem should be solved. However if the return is "1" but the problem persits, then the problem with the read/write is different from what is described here and you will probably have to look elsewhere for a solution (in this case, the second solution that I mentioned below). The first thing would be to make certain that the disk drive is turned on.
However If it returns a "0," then do the following:
2. Turn on Read/Write:
A. Shut down the computer.
B. Shut down the server, modem, gateway modem etc. (basically shut everything off).
C. Turn on your computer. Go to the login where you plan to use the NAS drive.
D. Hit the Spotlight icon (looking glass) and type in TERMINAL. Click on the TERMINAL icon.
E. While in the terminal, type the following verbatim:
defaults write com.Apple.AppleShareClient afp_cleartext_allow -bool YES
Test the settings by going back to Step 1. This should return a "1" now. If it does not, go to step 2 and try again.
You should be able to complete your session without any further hiccups.
Unfortunately, I found that you have to go through this entire thing on all logins, so if you have other members logging in under different accounts, you have to do this again.
So, I wrote most of the above about 2 weeks ago after installing the update. I had planned on installing Lightroom and using an External NAS drive for storage, but halted after running into this problem. A problem that has made me shy away from using a NAS drive as an iTunes server.
So, something came to mind a few days ago. It was akin to the resolution of the FACETIME fiasco that I faced when I purchased my iPhone 4. I recall that I had to reset my iPhone's network settings in order to use Facetime. So I thought about doing the same thing for this issue of the "on again, off again AFP/SMB" switch. Here is what I did:
Resetting Keychain Login for Nas Drive
1. Go to Terminal.
2. Type in "Keychain Access"
3. Find the name of your Disk Drive login. ie. "My_NAS.local"
4. Erase the two files that have the AFP and/or SMB login to that NAS drive.
(This assumes that you saved them to the Keychain).
5. Restart your machine.
6. Try to connect to the drive.
My results for this were mixed. AFP worked but would hang occasionally. SMB, surprisingly worked all of the time.
I then tried one more thing. I erased all of the network settings and started again from scratch. The results were the same as before. My conclusion: AFP is BROKEN ! Why SMB works is beyond me, but the only thing that I have not done is to reinstall OSX SNOW LEOPARD.
These are really Band Aid solutions. I hope that Apple comes up with a solution to this problem as it affects Time Machine which is critical. One worrisome point is the news that Apple will be abandoning the SMB file protocol in OSX Lion. This may be a little early given the problems that many are now having with the AFP solution.
I hope that this helps. By the way, I am no OSX, Cocoa, Obective-C master. I am far from it. I just poked around and I have a few really good books that I look at from time to time; not to mention the bulletin boards. If you have any suggestions please leave them in the comments. Especially if you find any mistakes above.
Thanks for reading.
Wednesday, April 20, 2011
Amazon Announces Library Lending. Is it Game Over?
Perhaps the biggest news of the day, sans the Apple blow out earnings report of course, was the quiet announcement from Amazon, as reported by Andrys Basten on Kindleworld, that local libraries will begin placing Kindle formatted books at local libraries - 11, 000 libraries to be precise. This is huge! It is a game changer and as I tweeted earlier today, it may be The Endgame!
The ability for an inexpensive device such as a Kindle to get into the library system and to have Amazon succeed in getting its own proprietary eBook system accepted is not only remarkable, but places Amazon on a path that will be hard to follow, let alone beat.
To understand this you have to understand that Barnes and Noble has been available to the library system for a while, using The Nook, but it hasn't really caught on. If Amazon can make this work, then they will have Kindle eBook readers everywhere, from the proprietary Amazon hardware to every Apple iPad, iPhone and/or idevice imaginable. If you can borrow a textbook in color, why bother going go the library to borrow it or worse, why buy it? As we can surmise, if this catches on, there will be more books in the proprietary .AZW format.
More importantly, the ePub system may actually die a painful death because of this. If all of the "good books" are in a proprietary Amazon .AZW (or .MOBI) format, then ePub will become a thing of the past, since Amazon's Kindle system does not recognize the ePub format at all. I particularly like the ePub format as it seems to accomodate a lot of other ereaders outside of Amazon. But this announcement could also put a dent in the Apple proprietary ereader iBook as well, since it too does not recognize .AZW. Amazon will win the format battle. I have to admit that Amazon's .AZW (and .MOBI) format is quite nice, but .ePub is equally as nice and I would hope that we will still have a choice in formats. Nevertheless, this is huge and I am surprised that more attention has not been payed to this.
One thing that I will have to say is that if Amazon can get this right with over the air downloads, instead of going through Overdrive on the desktop, they will win hands down. If you have to be tied to the desktop in order to borrow books, that could put the brakes on the whole thing. Overdrive is the software needed to facilitate the two-way encryption, DRM and authentication keys to ensure that the book expires after say 2 weeks.
A copy of the actual news release is listed below and if you get the chance, go to Kindleworld, Andrys Basten's great blog about all things Kindle.
Reference:
http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20110420005787/en/Amazon-Launch-Library-Lending-Kindle-Books Link
Other interesting reading:
Book lending on the Nook
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/mobile-gadgeteer/how-to-loan-ebooks-on-the-nook-with-lendme-service/2250 Link
The ability for an inexpensive device such as a Kindle to get into the library system and to have Amazon succeed in getting its own proprietary eBook system accepted is not only remarkable, but places Amazon on a path that will be hard to follow, let alone beat.
To understand this you have to understand that Barnes and Noble has been available to the library system for a while, using The Nook, but it hasn't really caught on. If Amazon can make this work, then they will have Kindle eBook readers everywhere, from the proprietary Amazon hardware to every Apple iPad, iPhone and/or idevice imaginable. If you can borrow a textbook in color, why bother going go the library to borrow it or worse, why buy it? As we can surmise, if this catches on, there will be more books in the proprietary .AZW format.
More importantly, the ePub system may actually die a painful death because of this. If all of the "good books" are in a proprietary Amazon .AZW (or .MOBI) format, then ePub will become a thing of the past, since Amazon's Kindle system does not recognize the ePub format at all. I particularly like the ePub format as it seems to accomodate a lot of other ereaders outside of Amazon. But this announcement could also put a dent in the Apple proprietary ereader iBook as well, since it too does not recognize .AZW. Amazon will win the format battle. I have to admit that Amazon's .AZW (and .MOBI) format is quite nice, but .ePub is equally as nice and I would hope that we will still have a choice in formats. Nevertheless, this is huge and I am surprised that more attention has not been payed to this.One thing that I will have to say is that if Amazon can get this right with over the air downloads, instead of going through Overdrive on the desktop, they will win hands down. If you have to be tied to the desktop in order to borrow books, that could put the brakes on the whole thing. Overdrive is the software needed to facilitate the two-way encryption, DRM and authentication keys to ensure that the book expires after say 2 weeks.
A copy of the actual news release is listed below and if you get the chance, go to Kindleworld, Andrys Basten's great blog about all things Kindle.
April 20, 2011 09:15 AM Eastern Daylight TimeAmazon to Launch Library Lending for Kindle Books
SEATTLE--(BUSINESS WIRE)--(NASDAQ: AMZN)— Amazon today announced Kindle Library Lending, a new feature launching later this year that will allow Kindle customers to borrow Kindle books from over 11,000 libraries in the United States. Kindle Library Lending will be available for all generations of Kindle devices and free Kindle reading apps.Customers will be able to borrow Kindle books from over 11,000 local libraries to read on Kindle and free Kindle reading appsWhispersyncing of notes, highlights and last page read to work for Kindle library books
“We’re excited that millions of Kindle customers will be able to borrow Kindle books from their local libraries”“We’re excited that millions of Kindle customers will be able to borrow Kindle books from their local libraries,” said Jay Marine, Director, Amazon Kindle. “Customers tell us they love Kindle for its Pearl e-ink display that is easy to read even in bright sunlight, up to a month of battery life, and Whispersync technology that synchronizes notes, highlights and last page read between their Kindle and free Kindle apps.”
Customers will be able to check out a Kindle book from their local library and start reading on any Kindle device or free Kindle app for Android, iPad, iPod touch, iPhone, PC, Mac, BlackBerry, or Windows Phone. If a Kindle book is checked out again or that book is purchased from Amazon, all of a customer’s annotations and bookmarks will be preserved.
“We're doing a little something extra here,” Marine continued. “Normally, making margin notes in library books is a big no-no. But we're extending our Whispersync technology so that you can highlight and add margin notes to Kindle books you check out from your local library. Your notes will not show up when the next patron checks out the book. But if you check out the book again, or subsequently buy it, your notes will be there just as you left them, perfectly Whispersynced.”
With Kindle Library Lending, customers can take advantage of all of the unique features of Kindle and Kindle books, including:
Amazon is working with OverDrive, the leading provider of digital content solutions for over 11,000 public and educational libraries in the United States, to bring a seamless library borrowing experience to Kindle customers. “We are excited to be working with Amazon to offer Kindle Library Lending to the millions of customers who read on Kindle and Kindle apps,” said Steve Potash, CEO, OverDrive. “We hear librarians and patrons rave about Kindle, so we are thrilled that we can be part of bringing library books to the unparalleled experience of reading on Kindle.”
- Paper-like Pearl electronic-ink display
- No glare even in bright sunlight
- Lighter than a paperback – weighs just 8.5 ounces and holds up to 3,500 books
- Up to one month of battery life with wireless off
- Read everywhere with free Kindle apps for Android, iPad, iPod touch, iPhone, PC, Mac, BlackBerry and Windows Phone
- Whispersync technology wirelessly sync your books, notes, highlights, and last page read across Kindle and free Kindle reading apps
- Real Page Numbers – easily reference passages with page numbers that correspond to actual print editions
Kindle Library Lending will be available later this year for Kindle and free Kindle app users. To learn more about Kindle go to www.amazon.com/kindle.
Reference:
http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20110420005787/en/Amazon-Launch-Library-Lending-Kindle-Books Link
Other interesting reading:
Book lending on the Nook
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/mobile-gadgeteer/how-to-loan-ebooks-on-the-nook-with-lendme-service/2250 Link
Labels:
Kindle,
Library lending,
library lending kindle
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




